Transfer the Process, Not the Whole Portfolio.
A transfer needs the full picture of how a product is made. Handing that over shouldn't mean handing over everything you know. Collabrix scopes what is shared to one site, one sponsor, one product — and lets it be disclosed in stages, a parameter and its range first, the reasoning behind it when the moment calls for it. Ten stages, from configuration through to comparability and closure, on one record both sides work in.
Request a DemoIn This Solution
Configured Once, Inherited Down
Template, product and stage layers, set at portfolio level.
Process Flow and Model
Generated from your uploads, populating the tabs beneath.
Gap-to-Activity Linkage
A gap ID carries into the plan and onto the record that closes it.
Extraction You Can Check
Extracted fields beside the source page, each scored for confidence.
Queries On the Record
Raised, assigned, answered and closed against the document.
A Transfer Needs Everything. Your IP Says Otherwise.
Technology transfer asks a sponsor to hand over the accumulated knowledge of how a product is made, to an organisation that also serves its competitors. Everything that follows — the withheld detail, the spreadsheets kept locally, the document emailed ten times — is a consequence of trying to manage that tension without a system built for it.
Why Existing Approaches Fall Short
All or Nothing
A transfer needs the full process picture, but sharing it wholesale exposes far more know-how than the one product at hand.
Critical Data on Local Devices
The spreadsheets and scans carrying the real detail sit on individual laptops, outside any system that can govern or retain them.
Silence Reads as Fine
When a parameter is simply absent, nothing marks it. The omission surfaces at the batch that fails, not at the review that should have caught it.
What It Costs Sponsors, CMOs and CDMOs
Sponsors
Protecting IP means withholding, and withholding means the partner learns what actually matters late in the transfer.
CMOs and CDMOs
Every transfer starts from a blank slate, in whichever structure this particular sponsor happens to prefer, at whatever level of digital maturity the relationship allows.
Both Sides
The same document is copied into ten stages and a dozen mailboxes, multiplying cybersecurity exposure with every duplicate.
Share What the Transfer Needs. Nothing Beyond It.
Collabrix treats disclosure as something to be scoped and staged rather than surrendered — and gives the transfer one record that both organisations work in, across all ten stages.
Scoped to site, sponsor and product
What a partner can see is bounded to the one product being transferred at the one site doing the work — not a window onto the portfolio behind it.
Graduated disclosure
Share the parameter and its range when the partner needs to build to it. The development rationale behind it follows when, and if, the transfer calls for it.
Meets the data where it lives
The spreadsheets and scans people already keep locally are accepted as they are, rather than requiring the knowledge to be re-entered before it can be shared.
Absence made visible
An empty cell raises a gap rather than quietly resolving to a low-risk default, so what was never provided is as visible as what was.
Guidance, not a gate
When a stage looks complete, the platform says so and leaves the call to the people running the transfer — a recommendation surfaced to the user, not a rule the system enforces.
Referenced, not copied
One document is referenced across all ten stages instead of duplicated into each — fewer copies in circulation, and one version everyone is reading.
Faster to Start, Traceable Throughout, Closed on the Record.
Transfers start from structure
Pre-built templates for each modality mean a new transfer begins from a relevant shape rather than a blank slate.
Gaps traceable to closure
Every gap and planned activity carries an ID, so remediation is followed from the moment it is registered to the moment it is closed.
Less time reading packages
Technical documents are summarised and their fields extracted with a confidence indicator, cutting manual review of transfer packages.
Questions stay on the record
Queries are raised against the document or tab they concern, assigned, answered and closed — not chased through inboxes.
Ten Stages, From Configuration to Closure.
Every transfer follows the same shape, with each stage carrying its own documents, reviews and approvals — and a progress view that shows where the transfer actually stands.
Configuration
Modality and product type set the data structures, document repositories, roles, permissions, approval workflows and stage timelines.
Knowledge Transfer
The sponsor provides process design information by workstream; the partner reviews and raises queries against it.
Gap Analysis
The partner proposes actions against the gaps found; the sponsor reviews and approves, and each item closes on evidence.
Planning
A deliverables plan per workstream, with critical-path and at-risk analysis, teams and leads assigned against it.
Lab Development
Development reports per workstream, analysed for issues, with corrective actions raised and gaps closed on sponsor review.
Pilot Batches
Lab- or pilot-scale batches at the partner site, with the same analysis, corrective actions and approval loop.
Qualification & Validation
Qualification and validation documents per workstream, reviewed and approved with version control from the repository.
Campaign Preparation
GMP campaign documentation — batch record, bill of materials, sample plan — plus dry runs at scale, with documentation updated on what they show.
GMP Campaign
The campaign hands off to commercial manufacturing rather than running as a register of its own — the batches execute in Manufacturing Collaboration, with the transfer holding the link back to them.
Comparability & Closure
Final campaign summary, comparability and accelerated stability assessments, and a lessons-learned report both sides sign off.
Where Technology Transfer Happens.
The Tech Transfer dashboard opens on the state of the portfolio — active transfers, items awaiting approval, open queries and anything at risk — and drills into a single transfer across its ten stages: the process design by workstream, the gap register and the activities gaps are linked to, the document repository with versions, and the queries raised against any document or tab.
Standardized ingestion
Each incoming dataset is pre-processed into a standard message format, whatever system it came from.
Standardized outbound messaging
Outbound data leaves as a standard message, on defined triggers, to the systems that consume it.
Broad system integration
Data is drawn from ERP, MES, QMS and LIMS across the sponsor and partner estate.
Role-based governance
What a user can see, and what they can act on, are both controlled by role.
Related Solutions
Technology Transfer ends where commercial supply begins. The neighbouring solutions carry the product from that first GMP campaign onward.
Manufacturing Collaboration
Challenge
Sponsors lack timely visibility into production at partner sites.
Outcome
Issues surface early, improving coordination and reducing delays.
Quality Collaboration
Challenge
Email-based deviation and batch reviews slow decisions.
Outcome
Faster resolution and stronger compliance readiness.
Forecast Collaboration
Challenge
Partners plan against outdated or informal demand signals.
Outcome
Accurate capacity planning with fewer supply gaps and less excess.
